Put on the sidelines of palliative care: a qualitative study of important barriers to GPs’ participation in palliative care and guideline implementation in Norway

1Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Demographic changes, the evolvement of modern medicine and new treatments for severe diseases, increase the need for palliative care services. Palliative care includes all patients with life-limiting conditions, irrespective of diagnosis. In Norway, palliative care rests on a decentralised model where patient care can be delivered close to the patient’s home, and the Norwegian guideline for palliative care describes a model of care resting on extensive collaboration. Previous research suggests that this guideline is not well implemented among general practitioners (GPs). In this study, we aim to investigate barriers to GPs’ participation in palliative care and implementation of the guideline. Methods: We interviewed 25 GPs in four focus groups guided by a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed qualitatively with reflexive thematic analysis. Results: We identified four main themes as barriers to GPs’ participation in palliative care and to implementation of the guideline: (1) different established local cultures and practices of palliative care, (2) discontinuity of the GP–patient relationship, (3) unclear clinical handover and information gaps and (4) a mismatch between the guideline and everyday general practice. Conclusion: Significant structural and individual barriers to GPs’ participation in palliative care exist, which hamper the implementation of the guideline. GPs should be involved as stakeholders when guidelines involving them are created. Introduction of new professionals in primary care needs to be actively managed to avoid inappropriate collaborative practices. Continuity of the GP–patient relationship must be maintained throughout severe illness and at end-of-life.

References Powered by Scopus

Using thematic analysis in psychology

110653Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power

5448Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?

4022Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Samtaler med pasienter om døden – erfarne fastlegers refleksjoner og erfaringer

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fasting, A., Hetlevik, I., & Mjølstad, B. P. (2024). Put on the sidelines of palliative care: a qualitative study of important barriers to GPs’ participation in palliative care and guideline implementation in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 42(2), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2306241

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Researcher 2

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

57%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

14%

Arts and Humanities 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free