Essential Care for Every Baby: Improving compliance with newborn care practices in rural Nicaragua

16Citations
Citations of this article
110Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Neonatal mortality comprises an increasing proportion of childhood deaths in the developing world. Essential newborn care practices as recommended by the WHO may improve neonatal outcomes in resource limited settings. Our objective was to pilot a Helping Babies Breathe and Essential Care for Every Baby (HBB and ECEB) implementation package using HBB-ECEB training combined with supportive supervision in rural Nicaragua. Methods: We employed an HBB-ECEB implementation package in El Ayote and Santo Domingo, two rural municipalities in Nicaragua and used a pre- and post- data collection design for comparison. Following a period of pre-intervention data collection (June-August 2015), care providers were trained in HBB and ECEB using a train-the- trainer model. An external supportive supervisor monitored processes of care and collected data. Data on newborn care processes and short-term outcomes such as hypothermia were collected from facility medical records and analyzed using standard run charts. Home visits were used to determine breastfeeding rates at 7, 30 and 60 days. Results: There were 480 institutional births during the study period (June 2015-June 2016). Following the HBB-ECEB implementation package, cord care improved (pre-intervention median 66%; post-intervention shift to ≥85%) and early skin-to-skin care improved (pre-intervention median 0%; post-intervention shift to ≥56%, with a high of 92% in June 2016). Rates of administration of ophthalmic ointment and vitamin K were high pre-intervention (median 97%) and remained high. Early initiation of breastfeeding increased with a pre-intervention median of 25% and post-intervention shift to ≥28%, with a peak of 81% in June 2016. Exclusive breastfeeding rates increased short-term but were not significantly different by 60-days of life (9% pre-intervention versus 21% post-intervention). Conclusions: The implementation of the HBB-ECEB programs combined with supportive supervision improved the quality of care for newborns in terms of cord care, early skin-to-skin care and early initiation of breastfeeding. The rates of administration of ophthalmic ointment and vitamin K were high pre- intervention and remained high afterwards. These findings show that HBB-ECEB programs implemented with supportive supervision can improve quality of care for newborns.

References Powered by Scopus

Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: An updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000

3042Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings?

772Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants

653Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Implementation of the helping babies breathe training program: A systematic review

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Digital health innovations, tools, and resources to support helping babies survive programs

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Beyond newborn resuscitation: Essential care for every baby and small babies

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perez, K., Patterson, J., Hinshaw, J., Escobar, C., Parajon, D., Parajon, L., & Bose, C. (2018). Essential Care for Every Baby: Improving compliance with newborn care practices in rural Nicaragua. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2003-y

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

55%

Researcher 11

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

47%

Nursing and Health Professions 21

41%

Social Sciences 4

8%

Decision Sciences 2

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free