Decomposing the problem-size effect: A comparison of response time distributions across cultures

44Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Is the locus of the problem-size effect in mental arithmetic different across cultures? In a novel approach to this question, the ex-Gaussian distributional model was applied to response times for large (e.g., 8 × 9) and small (e.g., 2 × 3) problems obtained from Chinese and Canadian graduate students in a multiplication production task (LeFevre & Liu, 1997). The problem-size effect for the Chinese group occurred in μ (the mean of the normal component), whereas the problem-size effect for the Canadian group occurred in both μ and τ (the mean of the exponential component). The results support the position that the problem-size effect for the Chinese group is purely a memory-retrieval effect, whereas for the Canadian group, it is an effect of both retrieval and the use of nonretrieval solution procedures.

References Powered by Scopus

A theory of memory retrieval

3418Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs

2155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics

867Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The development of arithmetical abilities

501Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of working memory in mental arithmetic

407Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Psychological interpretation of the ex-gaussian and shifted wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis

369Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Penner-Wilger, M., Leth-Steensen, C., & Lefevre, J. A. (2002). Decomposing the problem-size effect: A comparison of response time distributions across cultures. Memory and Cognition, 30(7), 1160–1167. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194333

Readers over time

‘07‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

33%

Researcher 9

23%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 32

84%

Social Sciences 2

5%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

5%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0