Adjusting spectral indices for spectral response function differences of very high spatial resolution sensors simulated from field spectra

30Citations
Citations of this article
120Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The use of data from multiple sensors is often required to ensure data coverage and continuity, but differences in the spectral characteristics of sensors result in spectral index values being different. This study investigates spectral response function effects on 48 spectral indices for cultivated grasslands using simulated data of 10 very high spatial resolution sensors, convolved from field reflectance spectra of a grass covered dike (with varying vegetation condition). Index values for 48 indices were calculated for original narrow-band spectra and convolved data sets, and then compared. The indices Difference Vegetation Index (DVI), Global Environmental Monitoring Index (GEMI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Modified Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (MSAVI 2) and Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), which include the difference between the near-infrared and red bands, have values most similar to those of the original spectra across all 10 sensors (1:1 line mean 1:1 R 2 0.960 and linear trend mean ccR 2 0.997). Additionally, relationships between the indices’ values and two quality indicators for grass covered dikes were compared to those of the original spectra. For the soil moisture indicator, indices that ratio bands performed better across sensors than those that difference bands, while for the dike cover quality indicator, both the choice of bands and their formulation are important.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Summary workflow of the materials and methods used in this study.
  • Table 1. Details of sensors used in this study (in order of maximum band width from narrowest to broadest).
  • Figure 2. Band positions and widths for the sensors used in this study.
  • Table 2. Individual statistical measures per sensor for representative indices, namely Difference Vegetation Index (DVI) and Global Environmental Monitoring Index (GEMI) representative of the overall performing well group, Anthocyanin Reflectance Index (ARI) and Carter Index 1 (CTR1) of the overall performing poorly group and Blue/Green Index 2 (BGI2) and Modified Simple Ratio (MSR) of the mixed performance group.
  • Figure 3. Scatterplots for representative indices, showing the relationships between the original ASD data and the spectrally simulated data of various sensors. (a) Difference Vegetation Index (DVI); (b) Global Environmental Monitoring Index (GEMI); (c) Anthocyanin Reflectance Index (ARI); (d) Carter Index 1 (CTR1); (e) Blue/Green Index 2 (BGI2) and (f) Modified Simple Ratio (MSR). The dashed line represents the 1:1 line.

References Powered by Scopus

River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - A discussion of principles

18901Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

NDWI - A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space

4969Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: Modeling and validation in the context of precision agriculture

2182Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sentinel-2 remote sensing of Zostera noltei-dominated intertidal seagrass meadows

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of spatial resolution on the classification of vegetation types in highly fragmented planting areas based on unmanned aerial vehicle hyperspectral images

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Red-Edge Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI<inf>705</inf>) from Sentinel-2 imagery to assess post-fire regeneration

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cundill, S. L., der van Werff, H. M. A., & der van Meijde, M. (2015). Adjusting spectral indices for spectral response function differences of very high spatial resolution sensors simulated from field spectra. Sensors (Switzerland), 15(3), 6221–6240. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150306221

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 49

60%

Researcher 22

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 22

31%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21

30%

Environmental Science 19

27%

Engineering 9

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0