Whole-genome sequencing for high-resolution investigation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemiology and genome plasticity

21Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections pose a major challenge in health care, yet the limited heterogeneity within this group hinders molecular investigations of related outbreaks. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been the gold standard approach but is impractical for many clinical laboratories and is often replaced with PCR-based methods. Regardless, both approaches can prove problematic for identifying subclonal outbreaks. Here, we explore the use of whole-genome sequencing for clinical laboratory investigations of MRSA molecular epidemiology. We examine the relationships of 44 MRSA isolates collected over a period of 3 years by using whole-genome sequencing and two PCR-based methods, multilocus variablenumber tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) and spa typing. We find that MLVA offers higher resolution than spa typing, as it resolved 17 versus 12 discrete isolate groups, respectively. In contrast, whole-genome sequencing reproducibly cataloged genomic variants (131,424 different single nucleotide polymorphisms and indels across the strain collection) that uniquely identified each MRSA clone, recapitulating those groups but enabling higher-resolution phylogenetic inferences of the epidemiological relationships. Importantly, whole-genome sequencing detected a significant number of variants, thereby distinguishing between groups that were considered identical by both spa typing (minimum, 1,124 polymorphisms) and MLVA (minimum, 193 polymorphisms); this suggests that these more conventional approaches can lead to false-positive identification of outbreaks due to inappropriate grouping of genetically distinct strains. An analysis of the distribution of variants across the MRSA genome reveals 47 mutational hot spots (comprising ∼2.5% of the genome) that account for 23.5% of the observed polymorphisms, and the use of this selected data set successfully recapitulates most epidemiological relationships in this pathogen group. Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w<sup>1118</sup>; iso-2; iso-3

7867Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed- field gel electrophoresis: Criteria for bacterial strain typing

7505Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies

6864Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Application of whole-genome sequencing for bacterial strain typing in molecular epidemiology

230Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE): A review of the “gold standard” for bacteria typing and current alternatives

133Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Large-scale genomic sequencing of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli strains

129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

SenGupta, D. J., Cummings, L. A., Hoogestraat, D. R., Butler-Wu, S. M., Shendure, J., Cookson, B. T., & Salipante, S. J. (2014). Whole-genome sequencing for high-resolution investigation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemiology and genome plasticity. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 52(8), 2787–2796. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00759-14

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2305101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

53%

Researcher 14

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22

41%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 14

26%

Medicine and Dentistry 13

24%

Immunology and Microbiology 5

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0