Evaluation of the Android accessibility API recognition rate towards a better user experience

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mobile applications are based on interactive common UI elements that represents pointing targets visible on the screen. The usage of mobile applications in eyes-free scenarios or by individuals with vision impairments requires effective alternative access to visual elements, i.e. accessibility features. Previous works evaluated the accuracy of UI element’s identification by accessibility APIs on desktop applications reporting that only 74% of the targets were correctly identified, but no recent research evaluated the accuracy for similar mobile APIs. We present an empirical evaluation based on the Android accessibility API that computes the UI recognition accuracy rate on ten popular mobile applications. Our findings indicate that accessibility average recognition rate is 97%.

References Powered by Scopus

Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices

351Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus

203Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Usability in the real world: Assessing medical information technologies in patients' homes

194Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The current status of accessibility in mobile apps

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Accessibility Evaluation of Mobile Applications for Monitoring Air Quality

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mobile banking apps in Poland and their accessibility for consumers with disabilities: a case study

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pichiliani, M. C., & Hirata, C. M. (2015). Evaluation of the Android accessibility API recognition rate towards a better user experience. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9175, pp. 340–349). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20678-3_33

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

43%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

29%

Researcher 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

63%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

13%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Engineering 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free