When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM

13.2kCitations
Citations of this article
22.1kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive, yet concise, overview of the considerations and metrics required for partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis and result reporting. Preliminary considerations are summarized first, including reasons for choosing PLS-SEM, recommended sample size in selected contexts, distributional assumptions, use of secondary data, statistical power and the need for goodness-of-fit testing. Next, the metrics as well as the rules of thumb that should be applied to assess the PLS-SEM results are covered. Besides presenting established PLS-SEM evaluation criteria, the overview includes the following new guidelines: PLSpredict (i.e., a novel approach for assessing a model’s out-of-sample prediction), metrics for model comparisons, and several complementary methods for checking the results’ robustness. Design/methodology/approach: This paper provides an overview of previously and recently proposed metrics as well as rules of thumb for evaluating the research results based on the application of PLS-SEM. Findings: Most of the previously applied metrics for evaluating PLS-SEM results are still relevant. Nevertheless, scholars need to be knowledgeable about recently proposed metrics (e.g. model comparison criteria) and methods (e.g. endogeneity assessment, latent class analysis and PLSpredict), and when and how to apply them to extend their analyses. Research limitations/implications: Methodological developments associated with PLS-SEM are rapidly emerging. The metrics reported in this paper are useful for current applications, but must always be up to date with the latest developments in the PLS-SEM method. Originality/value: In light of more recent research and methodological developments in the PLS-SEM domain, guidelines for the method’s use need to be continuously extended and updated. This paper is the most current and comprehensive summary of the PLS-SEM method and the metrics applied to assess its solutions.

References Powered by Scopus

A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

20683Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet

14915Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing

9263Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis

2924Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM

1722Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares

1050Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019, January 14). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4088

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 1583

23%

Researcher 573

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 542

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 3933

64%

Social Sciences 940

15%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 847

14%

Engineering 472

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 12
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 807

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free