Natural history of moderately dilated tubular ascending aorta: Implications for determining the optimal imaging interval

16Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

For a moderately dilated ascending aorta (diameter 35-54 mm), current guidelines recommend continuous annual or semiannual examinations with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. However, few data have shown the yield and benefit of such a protocol. This study aimed to investigate the fate of a moderately dilated ascending aorta and thereby determine the adequate imaging interval. METHODS: In our institutional database, we identified adult patients having an ascending aortic diameter ≤40mm in contrast-enhanced computed tomography and follow-up imaging(s) after ≤1 year. Of the 509 patients (mean age 67.2 ± 10.4 years) enrolled in the study, the maximal diameter of the ascending aorta was compared between the first and last images. Also, their medical records were reviewed to investigate the associated illness and clinical events. RESULTS: The mean growth rate of the patients with a 40-44mm (n = 321), 45-49mm (n = 142) and ≤50mm (n = 46) ascending aorta was 0.3 ± 0.5, 0.3 ± 0.5 and 0.7 ± 0.9 mm/year, respectively. During the mean interval of 4.3 ± 2.4 years, significant progression (diameter increase by ≤5 mm) occurred in 3.4, 5.6 and 21.7%, respectively. The 3-to 5-year rates of freedom from significant progression were 99.1%-96.5% (40-44 mm) and 97.8%-96.4% (45-49 mm). In multivariate analysis, initial ascending aortic diameter ≤45mm and aortic valve regurgitation were significantly associated with significant progression. Acute type A aortic dissection occurred in 5 patients (1%), before the maximal diameter of the ascending aorta reached 55mm or significant progression was observed. CONCLUSIONS: For a moderately dilated ascending aorta not exceeding 45mm in maximal diameter and stable in the first annual follow-up image, a 3-to 4-year interval would be reasonable before subsequent imaging. More frequent imaging may be warranted in patients with aortic valve insufficiency or with an aortic diameter ≤45 mm.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, K. H., Chung, S., Kim, D. J., Kim, J. S., & Lim, C. (2017). Natural history of moderately dilated tubular ascending aorta: Implications for determining the optimal imaging interval. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 51(5), 959–964. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx024

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

85%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

8%

Mathematics 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0