Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb positron emission tomography: Clinical validation with 15O-water

80Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with generator-produced 82Rb is an attractive alternative for centres without an on-site cyclotron. Our aim was to validate 82Rb-measured MBF in relation to that measured using 15O-water, as a tracer 100% of which can be extracted from the circulation even at high flow rates, in healthy control subject and patients with mild coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: MBF was measured at rest and during adenosine-induced hyperaemia with 82Rb and 15O-water PET in 33 participants (22 control subjects, aged 30±13 years; 11 CAD patients without transmural infarction, aged 60±13 years). A one-tissue compartment 82Rb model with ventricular spillover correction was used. The 82Rb flow-dependent extraction rate was derived from 15O-water measurements in a subset of 11 control subjects. Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) was defined as the hyperaemic/rest MBF. Pearson's correlation r, Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement (LoA), and Lin's concordance correlation ρ c (measuring both precision and accuracy) were used. Results: Over the entire MBF range (0.66-4.7 ml/min/g), concordance was excellent for MBF (r=0.90, [ 82Rb- 15O-water] mean difference±SD=0. 04±0.66 ml/min/g, LoA=-1.26 to 1.33 ml/min/g, ρ c=0.88) and MFR (range 1.79-5.81, r=0.83, mean difference=0.14±0.58, LoA=-0.99 to 1.28, ρ c=0.82). Hyperaemic MBF was reduced in CAD patients compared with the subset of 11 control subjects (2.53±0.74 vs. 3.62±0.68 ml/min/g, p=0.002, for 15O-water; 2.53±1.01 vs. 3.82±1.21 ml/min/g, p=0.013, for 82Rb) and this was paralleled by a lower MFR (2.65±0.62 vs. 3.79±0.98, p=0.004, for 15O-water; 2.85±0.91 vs. 3.88±0.91, p=0.012, for 82Rb). Myocardial perfusion was homogeneous in 1,114 of 1,122 segments (99.3%) and there were no differences in MBF among the coronary artery territories (p>0.31). Conclusion: Quantification of MBF with 82Rb with a newly derived correction for the nonlinear extraction function was validated against MBF measured using 15O-water in control subjects and patients with mild CAD, where it was found to be accurate at high flow rates. 82Rb-derived MBF estimates seem robust for clinical research, advancing a step further towards its implementation in clinical routine. © The Author(s) 2012.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prior, J. O., Allenbach, G., Valenta, I., Kosinski, M., Burger, C., Verdun, F. R., … Kaufmann, P. A. (2012). Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb positron emission tomography: Clinical validation with 15O-water. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 39(6), 1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2082-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

66%

Researcher 12

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

67%

Computer Science 4

11%

Physics and Astronomy 4

11%

Engineering 4

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free