Multi-method assessment of patients with febrile illness reveals over-diagnosis of malaria in rural Uganda

16Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Health clinics in rural Africa are typically resource-limited. As a result, many patients presenting with fever are treated with anti-malarial drugs based only on clinical presentation. This is a considerable issue in Uganda, where malaria is routinely over-diagnosed and over-treated, constituting a wastage of resources and an elevated risk of mortality in wrongly diagnosed patients. However, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria are increasingly being used in health facilities. Being fast, easy and inexpensive, RDTs offer the opportunity for feasible diagnostic capacity in resource-limited areas. This study evaluated the rate of malaria misdiagnosis and the accuracy of RDTs in rural Uganda, where presumptive diagnosis still predominates. Specifically, the diagnostic accuracy of "gold standard" methods, microscopy and PCR, were compared to the most feasible method, RDTs. Methods: Patients presenting with fever at one of two health clinics in the Kabarole District of Uganda were enrolled in this study. Blood was collected by finger prick and used to administer RDTs, make blood smears for microscopy, and blot Whatman FTA cards for DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, and sequencing. The accuracy of RDTs and microscopy were assessed relative to PCR, considered the new standard of malaria diagnosis. Results: A total of 78 patients were enrolled, and 31 were diagnosed with Plasmodium infection by at least one method. Comparing diagnostic pairs determined that RDTs and microscopy performed similarly, being 92.6 and 92.0 % sensitive and 95.5 and 94.4 % specific, respectively. Combining both methods resulted in a sensitivity of 96.0 % and specificity of 100 %. However, both RDTs and microscopy missed one case of non-falciparum malaria (Plasmodium malariae) that was identified and characterized by PCR and sequencing. In total, based on PCR, 62.0 % of patients would have been misdiagnosed with malaria if symptomatic diagnosis was used. Conclusions: Results suggest that diagnosis of malaria based on symptoms alone appears to be highly inaccurate in this setting. Furthermore, RDTs were very effective at diagnosing malaria, performing as well or better than microscopy. However, only PCR and DNA sequencing detected non-P. falciparum species, which highlights an important limitation of this test and a treatment concern for non-falciparum malaria patients. Nevertheless, RDTs appear the only feasible method in rural or resource-limited areas, and therefore offer the best way forward in malaria management in endemic countries.

References Powered by Scopus

Basic local alignment search tool

78925Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Overdiagnosis of malaria in patients with severe febrile illness in Tanzania: A prospective study

509Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Malaria misdiagnosis: Effects on the poor and vulnerable

374Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Climate change could shift disease burden from malaria to arboviruses in Africa

196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Climate change and vector-borne diseases of public health significance

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantifying the contribution of plasmodium falciparum malaria to febrile illness amongst african children

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghai, R. R., Thurber, M. I., El Bakry, A., Chapman, C. A., & Goldberg, T. L. (2016). Multi-method assessment of patients with febrile illness reveals over-diagnosis of malaria in rural Uganda. Malaria Journal, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1502-4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

60%

Researcher 18

31%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 21

51%

Social Sciences 7

17%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free