Severity and duration of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) before seeking care as predictors of healing time: A retrospective cohort study

95Citations
Citations of this article
226Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether A) duration of ulcer before start of treatment in specialist health care, and B) severity of ulcer according to University of Texas classification system (UT) at start of treatment (baseline), are independent predictors of healing time. Methods: This retrospective cohort study, based on electronic medical record data, included 105 patients from two outpatient clinics in Western Norway with a new diabetic foot ulcer during 2009-2011. The associations of duration of ulcer and ulcer severity with healing time were assessed using cumulative incidence curves and subdistribution hazard ratio estimated using competing risk regression with adjustment for potential confounders. Results: Of the 105 participants, 45.7% achieved ulcer healing, 36.2% underwent amputations, 9.5% died before ulcer healing and 8.5% were lost to follow-up. Patients who were referred to specialist health care by a general practitioner ≥ 52 days after ulcer onset had a 58% (SHR 0.42, CI 0.18-0.98) decreased healing rate compared to patients who were referred earlier, in the adjusted model. High severity (grade 2/3, stage C/D) according to the UT classification system was associated with a decreased healing rate compared to low severity (grade1, stage A/B or grade 2, stage A) with SHR (95% CI) equal to 0.14 (0.05-0.43) after adjustment for referral time and other potential confounders. Conclusion: Early detection and referral by both the patient and general practitioner are crucial for optimal foot ulcer healing. Ulcer grade and severity are also important predictors for healing time, and early screening to assess the severity and initiation of prompt treatment is important.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Flowchart: Study population.
  • Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with a diabetic foot ulcer.
  • Table 2. Association between severity of ulcer according to the UT classification system and time from patient-reported ulcer onset to referral by general practitioner to specialist health care.
  • Table 3. Ulcer characteristics of patients with a diabetic foot ulcer according to UT classification system at baseline.
  • Fig 2. Cumulative incidence curves of healing time stratified by duration of ulcer. P-values from univariate competing risk regression.
  • Fig 3. Cumulative incidence curves of healing time stratified by severity of ulcer. P-values from univariate competing risk regression.
  • Table 4. Subdistribution hazard regression model to calculate the association between duration of ulcer, severity of ulcer and healing time.

References Powered by Scopus

A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk

11332Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The global burden of diabetic foot disease

1925Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Competing risk regression models for epidemiologic data

1013Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Current challenges and opportunities in the prevention and management of diabetic foot ulcers

323Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementing TIMERS: The race against hard-to-heal wounds

203Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sucrose octasulfate dressing versus control dressing in patients with neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (Explorer): an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

197Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith-Strøm, H., Iversen, M. M., Igland, J., Østbye, T., Graue, M., Skeie, S., … Rokne, B. (2017). Severity and duration of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) before seeking care as predictors of healing time: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177176

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 50

61%

Researcher 18

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 56

52%

Nursing and Health Professions 38

35%

Engineering 8

7%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 6

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0