Application of Genomic Selection at the Early Stage of Breeding Pipeline in Tropical Maize

34Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In maize, doubled haploid (DH) line production capacity of large-sized maize breeding programs often exceeds the capacity to phenotypically evaluate the complete set of testcross candidates in multi-location trials. The ability to partially select DH lines based on genotypic data while maintaining or improving genetic gains for key traits using phenotypic selection can result in significant resource savings. The present study aimed to evaluate genomic selection (GS) prediction scenarios for grain yield and agronomic traits of one of the tropical maize breeding pipelines of CIMMYT in eastern Africa, based on multi-year empirical data for designing a GS-based strategy at the early stages of the pipeline. We used field data from 3,068 tropical maize DH lines genotyped using rAmpSeq markers and evaluated as test crosses in well-watered (WW) and water-stress (WS) environments in Kenya from 2017 to 2019. Three prediction schemes were compared: (1) 1 year of performance data to predict a second year; (2) 2 years of pooled data to predict performance in the third year, and (3) using individual or pooled data plus converting a certain proportion of individuals from the testing set (TST) to the training set (TRN) to predict the next year's data. Employing five-fold cross-validation, the mean prediction accuracies for grain yield (GY) varied from 0.19 to 0.29 under WW and 0.22 to 0.31 under WS, when the 1-year datasets were used training set to predict a second year's data as a testing set. The mean prediction accuracies increased to 0.32 under WW and 0.31 under WS when the 2-year datasets were used as a training set to predict the third-year data set. In a forward prediction scenario, good predictive abilities (0.53 to 0.71) were found when the training set consisted of the previous year's breeding data and converting 30% of the next year's data from the testing set to the training set. The prediction accuracy for anthesis date and plant height across WW and WS environments obtained using 1-year data and integrating 10, 30, 50, 70, and 90% of the TST set to TRN set was much higher than those trained in individual years. We demonstrate that by increasing the TRN set to include genotypic and phenotypic data from the previous year and combining only 10–30% of the lines from the year of testing, the predicting accuracy can be increased, which in turn could be used to replace the first stage of field-based screening partially, thus saving significant costs associated with the testcross formation and multi-location testcross evaluation.

References Powered by Scopus

Genome-wide regression and prediction with the BGLR statistical package

1036Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives

975Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize

455Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multi-Omics Pipeline and Omics-Integration Approach to Decipher Plant’s Abiotic Stress Tolerance Responses

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Genome-wide association studies of grain yield and quality traits under optimum and low-nitrogen stress in tropical maize (Zea mays L.)

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Genetic trends in CIMMYT’s tropical maize breeding pipelines

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beyene, Y., Gowda, M., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Olsen, M., Robbins, K. R., Burgueño, J., … Crossa, J. (2021). Application of Genomic Selection at the Early Stage of Breeding Pipeline in Tropical Maize. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.685488

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

64%

Researcher 7

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20

74%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

22%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free