A figure of merit assessment of the routes to hydrogen

352Citations
Citations of this article
417Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The efficient use of primary energy sources, which can be used for hydrogen production, is addressed by a consideration of four key measures, which reflect the ability of different sources and processing routes to meet underlying needs and the practical demands of energy on a large scale. The measures considered are carbon dioxide emission reduction, primary energy availability, land use implications and hydrogen production costs. Fourteen pathways to hydrogen are considered involving fossil fuels and nuclear energy as well as the range of renewable sources, and including additional strategies for carbon sequestration. The overall comparison of routes, based on simple figures-of-merit, shows a clear division between those using renewable energies and those associated with the traditional 'high energy density' primary sources. Emerging from the work is a clearer view of the implications of following a particular production path, the limitations of certain technologies and the research challenges which must be met in addressing future fuel options and global warming. © 2005 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

936Citations
1378Readers
Get full text
922Citations
1092Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ewan, B. C. R., & Allen, R. W. K. (2005). A figure of merit assessment of the routes to hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30(8), 809–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.02.003

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 176

67%

Researcher 51

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 30

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 103

50%

Chemistry 45

22%

Chemical Engineering 40

19%

Energy 20

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0