A survey on colonoscopy shows poor understanding of its protective value and widespread misconceptions across Europe

17Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Colonoscopy is a valuable screening tool for colorectal cancer. However, patients experience anxiety when faced with attending a first colonoscopy, and negative attitudes may contribute to non-attendance. Few studies in Europe have explored these attitudes, despite increasing colorectal cancer incidence. Study aim We conducted an online survey of the public in five European Union countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK), with the aim of understanding public knowledge of, perceptions of, and attitudes towards, colonoscopy and bowel preparation, amongst colonoscopy-naïve respondents. Attitudes towards colonoscopy were also gathered from colonoscopy-experienced patients. Methods Survey answers were gathered from 2,500 colonoscopy-naïve respondents and 500 colonoscopy-experienced patients, divided equally between countries. Results Across Europe, 72% of colonoscopy-naïve respondents showed receptiveness to colonoscopy if advised by their doctor to receive one, but only 45% understood its use to prevent colorectal cancer. Forty-three percent of colonoscopy-experienced respondents would still be embarrassed about having another colonoscopy, although 59% said that the experience had been better than expected. Colonoscopy-experienced respondents had greater aversion to bowel preparation than colonoscopy-naïve respondents (47% vs 26%), and 67% of colonoscopy-naïve respondents thought that only 1 litre of bowel preparation or less is required. Italians and the Spanish wanted more information than on average in Europe, while Germans had more realistic expectations of bowel preparation. Discussion There are perceptual gaps amongst the public around the purpose of colonoscopies, the subjective experience of the colonoscopy procedure, and the quantity of bowel preparation needed. These concerns could be mitigated by better education and using lower-volume bowel preparation techniques. Conclusion Europeans would have a colonoscopy, but its preventive medical purpose is poorly understood and there are misconceptions around the process. Further education about the procedure, its benefits and bowel preparation is vital to improve understanding and compliance.

References Powered by Scopus

Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

66851Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality

3705Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

688Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Screening and prevention of colorectal cancer

215Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficacy and safety of split-dose bowel preparation with 1 L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate compared with 2 L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate in a Korean population: a phase IV, multicenter, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of sedation on adenoma detection rate and cecal intubation rate in colonoscopy

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amlani, B., Radaelli, F., & Bhandari, P. (2020). A survey on colonoscopy shows poor understanding of its protective value and widespread misconceptions across Europe. PLoS ONE, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233490

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

61%

Researcher 4

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

52%

Psychology 4

19%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free