Physical activity as a predictor of absence of frailty in subjects with stable COPD and COPD exacerbation

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Frailty is a key issue in the care of elderly patients. Patients with COPD are more likely to be frail, with a prevalence of 57.8%. Frailty is associated with a low level of physical activity. The aim of this study was to analyze the predictive power and identify the cutoffs of physical activity in their different domains (household, leisure time, and sport) for the absence of frailty in subjects with COPD exacerbation and stable COPD. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The participants underwent an individual interview, including sociodemographic and clinical aspects. The total physical activity and its domains were assessed by the modified Baecke questionnaire, and frailty was measured according to the modified version of Fried. A total of 212 subjects with COPD (104 stable and 108 with COPD exacerbation) were enrolled, along with 100 healthy subjects. Results: The prevalence of frailty was higher in subjects with COPD compared with the control group. An activity level of 3.54 for COPD exacerbation, 3.88 for stable COPD, and 3.50 for healthy subjects assessed using the Baecke questionnaire were recommended as the cutoff points for frailty. Sensitivity and specificity values were 0.95 and 0.807; 0.95 and 0.815; and 0.95 and 0.947, respectively. Conclusions: Physical activity level can predict the absence or presence of frailty in subjects with stable and exacerbated COPD.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Valenza, M. C., Torres-Sánchez, I., Cabrera-Martos, I., Rodríguez-Torres, J., González-Jiménez, E., & Muñoz-Casaubon, T. (2016). Physical activity as a predictor of absence of frailty in subjects with stable COPD and COPD exacerbation. Respiratory Care, 61(2), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04118

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

75%

Researcher 6

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

48%

Nursing and Health Professions 14

33%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

12%

Sports and Recreations 3

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0