Inequity in Access and Delivery of Virtual Care Interventions: A Scoping Review

26Citations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objectives of this review were to map and summarize the existing evidence from a global perspective about inequity in access and delivery of virtual care interventions and to identify strategies that may be adopted by virtual care services to address these inequities. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL using both medical subject headings (MeSH) and free-text keywords for empirical studies exploring inequity in ambulatory services offered virtually. Forty-one studies were included, most of them cross-sectional in design. Included studies were extracted using a customized extraction tool, and descriptive analysis was performed. The review identified widespread differences in accessing and using virtual care interventions among cultural and ethnic minorities, older people, socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, people with limited digital and/or health literacy, and those with limited access to digital devices and good connectivity. Potential solutions addressing these barriers identified in the review included having digitally literate caregivers present during virtual care appointments, conducting virtual care appointments in culturally sensitive manner, and having a focus on enhancing patients’ digital literacy. We identified evidence-based practices for virtual care interventions to ensure equity in access and delivery for their virtual care patients.

References Powered by Scopus

PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation

19712Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for covid-19

2230Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient-centred access to health care: Conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations

1876Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Leave no one behind: the role of digital health literacy

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

‘Without support CALD patients will be left behind’: A mixed-methods exploration of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) client perspectives of telehealth and those of their healthcare providers

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nurse-led virtual interventions in managing chronic diseases: A protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mistry, S. K., Shaw, M., Raffan, F., Johnson, G., Perren, K., Shoko, S., … Haigh, F. (2022, August 1). Inequity in Access and Delivery of Virtual Care Interventions: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159411

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

53%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

17%

Researcher 5

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 9

36%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

28%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

24%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free