Retail-bank efficiency: Nonstandard goals and environmental determinants

8Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper analyzes technical and scale efficiency of Austrian savings and cooperative banks. Non-profit objectives are also considered with respect to input–output choice, which contributes to adequate performance measurements for alternative banks. Efficiency score estimates obtained via Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) reveal considerable potential for improvement in terms of intermediation efficiency. Several environmental determinants prove significant, but the cumulative predictive content of exogenous factors is rather modest. Bank efficiency improves in both underdeveloped and prosperous markets, while increased rival size and distance appear to be detriments to efficiency. A concluding discussion of confounding factors reveals the managerial, stakeholder, and policy implications of the results.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring the efficiency of decision making units

22148Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS.

11773Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis

3410Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Using environmental, social, governance (ESG) and financial indicators to measure bank cost efficiency in Asia

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spatial dependence in the technical efficiency of local banks

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Financial efficiency of the Municipal Savings and Credit Banks (CMAC) of Peru in the period 2015-2021

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burgstaller, J. (2020). Retail-bank efficiency: Nonstandard goals and environmental determinants. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 91(2), 269–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12270

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

57%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0