Isopycnal averaging and the residual mean circulation

91Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The zonally averaged circulation in the atmosphere or ocean can be misleading if the averaging is performed at constant height. In the ocean there is apparently anomalously large diapycnal motion forming the so-called Deacon cell. The atmospheric equivalents are the Ferrel cells. There are two zonal averaging techniques commonly used to avoid these spurious cells. One involves averaging at constant density, and this technique has been used in both fluids. The other technique, which has so far been applied only in the atmosphere, involves taking into account perturbation correlation terms to form the residual mean circulation. Using a Taylor series expansion, we show that these apparently dissimilar techniques are formally equivalent at leading order in perturbation amplitude. The equivalence is demonstrated using output from the FRAM Southern Ocean numerical model.

References Powered by Scopus

Eliassen-Palm cross sections for the troposphere.

817Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PLANETARY WAVES IN HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SHEAR: THE GENERALIZED ELIASSEN-PALM RELATION AND THE MEAN ZONAL ACCELERATION.

808Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Deacon cell and the other meridional cells of the Southern Ocean

256Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Atmospheric and oceanic fluid dynamics: Fundamentals and large-scale circulation, second edition

765Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An eddy-permitting Southern Ocean state estimate

357Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Developments in ocean climate modelling

315Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mcintosh, P. C., & Mcdougall, T. J. (1996). Isopycnal averaging and the residual mean circulation. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 26(8), 1655–1660. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1996)026<1655:IAATRM>2.0.CO;2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 16

42%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

39%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 29

73%

Physics and Astronomy 5

13%

Environmental Science 4

10%

Mathematics 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free