Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A Review and Comparison of Strategies

878Citations
Citations of this article
275Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Notions of equivalence in cross-cultural measurement were related to the abstraction-concreteness and the universality-cultural difference continua. Various methods proposed for attaining satisfactory measurement were reviewed and compared within this framework. Each strategy has its own merits and shortcomings. Moreover, the level of cross-cultural equivalence presupposed, the type of equivalence demonstrated and/or improved, and the equivalence assumptions doubted or explicitly rejected are different for different strategies. It was suggested that the strategies are complementary to each other. More than one strategy should be employed and combined for more meaningful and precise measurement. © 1985, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

Back-translation for cross-cultural research

9934Citations
3399Readers
Get full text
7239Citations
4666Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A Review and Comparison of Strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002185016002001

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 133

62%

Researcher 42

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 27

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 13

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 86

46%

Social Sciences 50

26%

Business, Management and Accounting 39

21%

Medicine and Dentistry 14

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0