A split-face study assessing the clinical benefit, tolerability and subject satisfaction of a dermocosmetic in subjects with rosacea associated with erythema and sensitive skin

12Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of M89 in patients with rosacea associated with erythema and sensitive skin. Methods: Intra-individual study in a split-face design comparing after 30 days M89 twice daily and usual skin care in 20 adult subjects with rosacea and sensitive skin. M89 contains 89% Vichy volcanic mineralizing water (VVMW) and 0.4% hyaluronic acid. It is hypoallergenic and contains no perfume and this convenes in rosacea. Contained minerals reinforce the natural defences of the skin in restoring the natural skin barrier, stimulating antioxidant activity and reducing inflammation, commonly observed in subjects with rosacea. Clinical evaluations included assessment of erythema, desquamation, papules and pustules, skin tightness, dryness, burning sensation, itching, stinging and stinging test as well as local tolerability. Instrumental evaluations included skin hydration and TEWL. Subject satisfaction was assessed at Days 15 and 30. Demodex density was assessed at Day 30. Results: A significant superiority of M89 over the standard skin care was observed for erythema, skin tightness and dryness (all P≤0.05) as early as Day 15, the skin stinging test was significantly in favour of M89 (P<0.05 at Day 15 and P<0.01 at Day 30) and for skin hydration (P<0.0001) at Day 15 and 30 with no difference in mean Demodex density between M89 and usual skin care after 30 days. Tolerance was excellent and subject satisfaction very high. Conclusion: Study results concerning M89 are encouraging for its use either alone or as an adjuvant daily skin care to topical medication in patients with persistent centrofacial erythema of rosacea with no more than 3 papules and pustules.

References Powered by Scopus

Rosacea: I. Etiology, pathogenesis, and subtype classification

506Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Standard classification and pathophysiology of rosacea: The 2017 update by the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee

375Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Updating the diagnosis, classification and assessment of rosacea: recommendations from the global ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel

212Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Use of botulinum toxin in treating rosacea: A systematic review

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A dermocosmetic formulation containing Vichy volcanic mineralizing water, Vitreoscilla filiformis extract, niacinamide, hyaluronic acid, and vitamin E regenerates and repairs acutely stressed skin

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of the cosmetic use and potentially therapeutic importance of hyaluronic acid

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berardesca, E., Bonfigli, A., Cribier, B., Flament, F., Vicic, M., Kerob, D., & Tan, J. (2020). A split-face study assessing the clinical benefit, tolerability and subject satisfaction of a dermocosmetic in subjects with rosacea associated with erythema and sensitive skin. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 13, 751–758. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S266879

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

20%

Researcher 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

67%

Chemistry 2

13%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

13%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0