Contextualising Safety in Numbers: A longitudinal investigation into change in cycling safety in Britain, 1991-2001 and 2001-2011

10Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction The 'Safety in Numbers' (SiN) phenomenon refers to a decline of injury risk per time or distance exposed as use of a mode increases. It has been demonstrated for cycling using cross-sectional data, but little evidence exists as to whether the effect applies longitudinally-that is, whether changes in cycling levels correlate with changes in per-cyclist injury risks. Methods This paper examines cross-sectional and longitudinal SiN effects in 202 local authorities in Britain, using commuting data from 1991, 2001 and 2011 censuses plus police-recorded data on 'killed and seriously injured' (KSI) road traffic injuries. We modelled a log-linear relationship between number of injuries and number of cycle commuters. Second, we conducted longitudinal analysis to examine whether local authorities where commuter cycling increased became safer (and vice versa). Results The paper finds a cross-sectional SiN effect exists in the 1991, 2001 and 2011 censuses. The longitudinal analysis also found a SiN effect, that is, places where cycling increased were more likely to become safer than places where it had declined. Finally, these longitudinal results are placed in the context of changes in pedestrian, cyclist and motorist safety. While between 1991 and 2001 all modes saw declines in KSI risk (37% for pedestrians, 36% for cyclists and 27% for motor vehicle users), between 2001 and 2011 pedestrians and motorists saw even more substantial declines (41% and 49%), while risk for cyclists increased by 4%. Conclusion The SiN mechanism does seem to operate longitudinally as well as cross-sectionally. However, at a national level between 2001-11 it co-existed with an increase in cyclist injury risk both in absolute terms and in relation to other modes.

References Powered by Scopus

The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives

1401Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Route infrastructure and the risk of injuries to bicyclists: A case-crossover study

249Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does More Cycling Mean More Diversity in Cycling?

197Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The development of cycling in european countries since 1990

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evidence for the a € safety in density' effect for cyclists: Validation of agent-based modelling results

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How does hourly variation in exposure to cyclists and motorised vehicles affect cyclist safety? A case study from a Dutch cycling capital

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aldred, R., Goel, R., Woodcock, J., & Goodman, A. (2019). Contextualising Safety in Numbers: A longitudinal investigation into change in cycling safety in Britain, 1991-2001 and 2001-2011. Injury Prevention, 25(3), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042498

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

55%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

18%

Researcher 4

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 7

37%

Social Sciences 5

26%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

21%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

16%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free