Diagnostic score for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after cardiopulmonary bypass

147Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs in nearly 3% of patients treated with heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). HIT carries a risk of severe thrombotic complications, and must be diagnosed rapidly. To identify simple criteria for estimating the probability of HIT after CPB, we retrospectively analyzed the files of 84 patients with suspected HIT after CPB and we analyzed the usefulness of several variables collected at the time of HIT suspicion to estimate HIT probability. HIT was confirmed in 35 cases and ruled out in 49 cases, on the basis of a platelet increment after heparin withdrawal, detection of heparin-dependent antibodies, and absence of other clear cause of thrombocytopenia. A biphasic platelet count from CPB to the first day of suspected HIT, an interval of ≥ 5 days from CPB to the first day of suspected HIT, and a CPB duration of ≤ 118 min were independent risk factors for HIT. These variables were combined to create a post-CPB HIT probability score. The score correctly identified 34/35 HIT patients and 28/49-non-HIT patients. This score, which can be applied as soon as HIT is suspected after CPB, has very good negative predictive value (97%). Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings. © 2004 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lillo-Le Louët, A., Boutouyrie, P., Alhenc-Gelas, M., Le Beller, C., Gautier, I., Aiach, M., & Lasne, D. (2004). Diagnostic score for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after cardiopulmonary bypass. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2(11), 1882–1888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00949.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

42%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

31%

Researcher 7

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 36

86%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

5%

Environmental Science 2

5%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free