Monitoring of marine nematode communities through 18S rRNA metabarcoding as a sensitive alternative to morphology

23Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Nematodes are suitable indicators for environmental perturbations because their distribution is closely linked to sediment characteristics. To evaluate whether DNA-based approaches can complement or even outperform morphology-based monitoring, careful evaluation of both approaches is needed using field samples that clearly differ in environmental parameters. We compared metabarcoding, targeting the 18S rRNA and COI genes, with morphological identification of the nematode communities in three different land use areas (aquaculture, industry and nature reserve) in Vietnamese mangroves. The areas differed in heavy metal and nitrate content and granulometry. We additionally generated reference Sanger sequences from these areas in order to improve the genus and species level assignments of the metabarcode data. We compared nematode densities, species and genus composition and diversity estimates, and nematode specific indices in relation to the environmental differences between areas. Our results show that multivariate patterns were similar between the three approaches, while the 18S rRNA metabarcoding dataset best described changes in diversity and community composition in relation to the environmental differences in our sites. The taxonomic composition of the samples was strikingly different depending on the method and less taxa were detected using DNA based methods than the morphology-based method. We show that this is mainly attributed to a lack of entries in the reference databases. The 18S rRNA metabarcoding approach provides a reliable and fast way to screen for environmental changes. Nevertheless, when we also want to understand those changes, the ecological and biological information linked to taxonomy remain essential. We therefore advocate that the addition of new reference sequences from vouchered specimens to reference databases should be an essential part of every metabarcoding study.

References Powered by Scopus

QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data

28841Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools

21359Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data

19941Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparing environmental metabarcoding and trawling survey of demersal fish communities in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada

78Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What makes a better indicator? Taxonomic vs functional response of nematodes to estuarine gradient

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characterizing parasitic nematode faunas in faeces and soil using DNA metabarcoding

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tytgat, B., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, T. X. P., Pham, T. M., Long, P. K., Vanreusel, A., & Derycke, S. (2019). Monitoring of marine nematode communities through 18S rRNA metabarcoding as a sensitive alternative to morphology. Ecological Indicators, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105554

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

52%

Researcher 21

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24

56%

Environmental Science 11

26%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

14%

Computer Science 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free