(A)wake for ‘The passions of this earth’: Extinction and the absurd ‘ethics’ of novel ecosystems

2Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Drawing on the work of Albert Camus this paper offers a critique of certain ecomodernist discourses around ‘novel ecosystems’. These new species ‘assemblages’ are frequently defended, or even celebrated, as exemplifying resilience and adaptability to the environmental repercussions of a global situation inaccurately glossed as ‘The Anthropocene’. Here the increasing prevalence of economically generated changes, including the accelerating translocations of species, are set against earlier conservation values emphasizing protection of ‘natural’ and ‘native’ ecologies. The proliferation of novel ecosystems, together with an instrumental emphasis on their functional, ‘pragmatic’, and economic benefits, appears to make environmentalists’ ethical concerns about the loss of endangered others seem ‘absurd’ and frames conservation as a Sisyphean and hopeless task. Yet Camus early work provides arguments for ethical/ political resistance in just such absurd and extreme circumstances.

References Powered by Scopus

Nature

385Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Anthropocene could raise biological diversity

96Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Reaches of Freedom: A Response to An Ecomodernist Manifesto

0
26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation?

397Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Can one be happy without God? An answer from the thought of Albert Camus

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, M. (2019). (A)wake for ‘The passions of this earth’: Extinction and the absurd ‘ethics’ of novel ecosystems. Cultural Studies Review, 25(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v25i1.6448

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

88%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

40%

Philosophy 1

20%

Design 1

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0