Skeletal muscle remodeling in response to eccentric vs. concentric loading: Morphological, molecular, and metabolic adaptations

249Citations
Citations of this article
1.0kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Skeletal muscle contracts either by shortening or lengthening (concentrically or eccentrically, respectively); however, the two contractions substantially differ from one another in terms of mechanisms of force generation, maximum force production and energy cost. It is generally known that eccentric actions generate greater force than isometric and concentric contractions and at a lower metabolic cost. Hence, by virtue of the greater mechanical loading involved in active lengthening, eccentric resistance training (ECC RT) is assumed to produce greater hypertrophy than concentric resistance training (CON RT). Nonetheless, prevalence of either ECC RT or CON RT in inducing gains in muscle mass is still an open issue, with some studies reporting greater hypertrophy with eccentric, some with concentric and some with similar hypertrophy within both training modes. Recent observations suggest that such hypertrophic responses to lengthening vs. shortening contractions are achieved by different adaptations in muscle architecture. Whilst the changes in muscle protein synthesis in response to acute and chronic concentric and eccentric exercise bouts seem very similar, the molecular mechanisms regulating the myogenic adaptations to the two distinct loading stimuli are still incompletely understood. Thus, the present review aims to, (a) critically discuss the literature on the contribution of eccentric vs. concentric loading to muscular hypertrophy and structural remodeling, and, (b) clarify the molecular mechanisms that may regulate such adaptations. We conclude that, when matched for either maximum load or work, similar increase in muscle size is found between ECC and CON RT. However, such hypertrophic changes appear to be achieved through distinct structural adaptations, which may be regulated by different myogenic and molecular responses observed between lengthening and shortening contractions.

References Powered by Scopus

Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers.

2950Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Muscle structure and theories of contraction.

2592Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres

2148Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Eccentric muscle contractions: Risks and benefits

257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Maximizing muscle hypertrophy: A systematic review of advanced resistance training techniques and methods

166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exercise and nutrition strategies to counteract sarcopenic obesity

121Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Franchi, M. V., Reeves, N. D., & Narici, M. V. (2017, July 4). Skeletal muscle remodeling in response to eccentric vs. concentric loading: Morphological, molecular, and metabolic adaptations. Frontiers in Physiology. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00447

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 356

71%

Researcher 62

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 57

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 24

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Sports and Recreations 335

60%

Nursing and Health Professions 93

17%

Medicine and Dentistry 88

16%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 47

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 27

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free