Effects of street tree shade on asphalt concrete pavement performance

72Citations
Citations of this article
140Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Forty-eight street segments were paired into 24 high-and low-shade pairs in Modesto, California, U.S. Field data were collected to calculate a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and Tree Shade Index (TSI) for each segment. Statistical analyses found that greater PCI was associated with greater TSI, indicating that tree shade was partially responsible for reduced pavement fatigue cracking, rutting, shoving, and other distress. Using observed relations between PCI and TSI, an unshaded street segment required 6 slurry seals over 30 years, while an identical one planted with 12 crape myrtles (Lagerstroemia indica, 4.4 m [14 ft] crown diameter) required 5 slurry seals, and one with 6 Chinese hackberry (Celtis sinensis, 13.7 m [45 ft] crown diameter) required 2.5 slurry seals. Shade from the large hackberries was projected to save $7.13/m2 ($0.66/ft2) over the 30-year period compared to the unshaded street. © 2005 International Society of Arboriculture.

References Powered by Scopus

Heat storage of pavement and its effect on the lower atmosphere

258Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Million trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment

300Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The benefits of trees for livable and sustainable communities

184Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using objective and subjective measures of neighborhood greenness and accessible destinations for understanding walking trips and BMI in Seattle, Washington

167Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McPherson, E. G., & Muchnick, J. (2005). Effects of street tree shade on asphalt concrete pavement performance. Journal of Arboriculture, 31(6), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2005.039

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 49

62%

Researcher 16

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 36

46%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23

29%

Engineering 13

16%

Design 7

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0