Introducing a practice perspective on monitoring for adaptive management

18Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Adaptive management (AM) is one of the most prominent ways ecologists contribute to ecosystem management, policy, and planning. AM treats management actions as experiments to monitor and learn from, creating a central role for ecologists in constructing the monitoring programs intended to guide learning. Yet, ecologists have found monitoring for AM challenging. They face a daunting series of dilemmas: How to produce monitoring programs that are responsive to management goals and provide clear signals for action, in ever-changing social-ecological contexts, and in light of impending deadlines, limited funding and available skills? The applied ecological literature has so far struggled to account for the ways in which these dilemmas are experienced and resolved “on the ground.” We address this problem by using contemporary practice theory to develop a practice perspective on monitoring for AM. Practice theory foregrounds the activities of science, viewing knowledge and context as products of practical action. We develop our practice perspective, rooted in pragmatist philosophy and relational thinking, through an empirical case study of a group of ecologists tasked with developing an adaptive approach to the restoration of threatened vegetation in an Australian national park. A practice perspective enables us to trace in real time the myriad experiential, situated, practical judgments made by the scientists to navigate the tricky dilemmas they encounter. We thus highlight the messy complexities of scientific knowledge production, while retaining a commitment to the value of science for management. Our work is relevant for ecologists working at the science-policy interface because it reveals the embodied competencies essential for the production of usable knowledge. Our focus on the temporality of ecological fieldwork—the progression of monitoring in unfolding time—helps to extend practice-based research in environmental management. By providing a relational account of practice, knowledge, and context in applied scientific research, we contribute to efforts in the environmental and sustainability sciences to develop relational understandings of people and nature. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

References Powered by Scopus

Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern

3846Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The need for evidence-based conservation

1431Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium

1407Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations

289Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characterisation of vegetation response to climate change: A review

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Negotiating the ethical-political dimensions of research methods: a key competency in mixed methods, inter- and transdisciplinary, and co-production research

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

West, S., Beilin, R., & Wagenaar, H. (2019). Introducing a practice perspective on monitoring for adaptive management. People and Nature, 1(3), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10033

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

57%

Researcher 11

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 11

37%

Environmental Science 9

30%

Business, Management and Accounting 6

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free