Pretreatment chest x-ray severity and its relation to bacterial burden in smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis

33Citations
Citations of this article
120Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Chest radiographs are used for diagnosis and severity assessment in tuberculosis (TB). The extent of disease as determined by smear grade and cavitation as a binary measure can predict 2-month smear results, but little has been done to determine whether radiological severity reflects the bacterial burden at diagnosis. Methods: Pre-treatment chest x-rays from 1837 participants with smear-positive pulmonary TB enrolled into the REMoxTB trial (Gillespie et al., N Engl J Med 371:1577-87, 2014) were retrospectively reviewed. Two clinicians blinded to clinical details using the Ralph scoring system performed separate readings. An independent reader reviewed discrepant results for quality assessment and cavity presence. Cavitation presence was plotted against time to positivity (TTP) of sputum liquid cultures (MGIT 960). The Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed to calculate the difference in average TTP for these groups. The average lung field affected was compared to log 10 TTP by linear regression. Baseline markers of disease severity and patient characteristics were added in univariable regression analysis against radiological severity and a multivariable regression model was created to explore their relationship. Results: For 1354 participants, the median TTP was 117 h (4.88 days), being 26 h longer (95% CI 16-30, p < 0.001) in patients without cavitation compared to those with cavitation. The median percentage of lung-field affected was 18.1% (IQR 11.3-28.8%). For every 10-fold increase in TTP, the area of lung field affected decreased by 11.4%. Multivariable models showed that serum albumin decreased significantly as the percentage of lung field area increased in both those with and without cavitation. In addition, BMI and logged TTP had a small but significant effect in those with cavitation and the number of severe TB symptoms in the non-cavitation group also had a small effect, whilst other factors found to be significant on univariable analysis lost this effect in the model. Conclusions: The radiological severity of disease on chest x-ray prior to treatment in smear positive pulmonary TB patients is weakly associated with the bacterial burden. When compared against other variables at diagnosis, this effect is lost in those without cavitation. Radiological severity does reflect the overall disease severity in smear positive pulmonary TB, but we suggest that clinicians should be cautious in over-interpreting the significance of radiological disease extent at diagnosis.

References Powered by Scopus

The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews

3183Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration

830Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus: convergence of two epidemics

676Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Tuberculosis Treatment Monitoring and Outcome Measures: New Interest and New Strategies

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Screening for pulmonary tuberculosis in high-risk groups of diabetic patients

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relapse or Re-Infection, the Situation of Recurrent Tuberculosis in Eastern China

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murthy, S. E., Chatterjee, F., Crook, A., Dawson, R., Mendel, C., Murphy, M. E., … Zumla, A. (2018). Pretreatment chest x-ray severity and its relation to bacterial burden in smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis. BMC Medicine, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1053-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 39

67%

Researcher 14

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 36

59%

Immunology and Microbiology 9

15%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

13%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 8

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free