Ontogeny, Genetics, and Evolution: A Perspective from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

7Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The study of genetic developmental disorders originally seemed to hold the promise for those of a nativist persuasion of demonstrating pure dissociations between different cognitive functions, as well as the existence of innately specified modules in the brain and the direct mapping of mutated genes to specific cognitive-level outcomes. However, more recent research within a neuroconstructivist perspective has challenged this promise, arguing that earlier researchers lost sight of one fundamental explanatory factor in both the typical and atypical case: the actual process of ontogenetic development. The paper is divided into three parts on evolution, genetics, and ontogeny. Each section starts by examining nativist claims about innateness and modularity of function, and subsequently evaluates them within a neuroconstructivist approach to human development.

References Powered by Scopus

A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder

1535Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language

1123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders

923Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Genes and ideologies

96Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Computer simulation as a scientific approach in evolutionary linguistics

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Time for a Change: Topical Amendments to the Medical Model of Disease

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2006). Ontogeny, Genetics, and Evolution: A Perspective from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. Biological Theory, 1(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2006.1.1.44

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 8

44%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

56%

Psychology 5

31%

Philosophy 1

6%

Neuroscience 1

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free