Graph embeddings for frame identification

4Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Lexical resources such as WordNet (Miller, 1995) and FrameNet (Baker et al., 1998) are organized as graphs, where relationships between words are made explicit via the structure of the resource. This work explores how structural information from these lexical resources can lead to gains in a downstream task, namely frame identification. While much of the current work in frame identification uses various neural architectures to predict frames, those neural architectures only use representations of frames based on annotated corpus data. We demonstrate how incorporating knowledge directly from the FrameNet graph structure improves the performance of a neural network-based frame identification system. Specifically, we construct a bidirectional LSTM with a loss function that incorporates various graph- and corpus-based frame embeddings for learning and ultimately achieves strong performance gains with the graph-based embeddings over corpus-based embeddings alone.

References Powered by Scopus

GloVe: Global vectors for word representation

26877Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

WordNet: A Lexical Database for English

11661Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Retrofitting word vectors to semantic lexicons

486Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Improving Citizen-initiated Police Reform Efforts through Interactive Design: A Case Study in Allegheny County

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research on Artificial Neural Networks in Bulgarian Academy of Sciences

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Popov, A., & Sikos, J. (2019). Graph embeddings for frame identification. In International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP (Vol. 2019-September, pp. 939–948). Incoma Ltd. https://doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_109

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

71%

Researcher 5

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 21

72%

Linguistics 6

21%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Social Sciences 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0