Marine stewardship council (Msc) certification of arctic fisheries: Processes and outcomes

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Certification according to private sustainability standards (ecolabelling) has become an important addition to public fisheries management in recent years. The major global ecolabel in terms of comprehensiveness and coverage is the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Fisheries Standard. Under the MSC Standard, the status of the fishery’s target stocks, its impact on the wider ecosystem and the effectiveness of its management system are assessed. Becoming and remaining certified requires continuous behavioural adaptation from fisheries through a fine-meshed system of conditions attached to certification. In this article, MSC certification of two clusters of fisheries in Arctic waters is discussed, one large-and one small-scale. In the Barents Sea cod and haddock fisheries, the main obstacle to certification has been the fisheries’ impact on endangered, threat-ened and protected (ETP) species and bottom habitats, and in order to remain certified beyond the first five-year certification period, the fishing companies have had to introduce a number of voluntary measures beyond what is required by law. In the local lumpfish fisheries in Greenland, Iceland and Norway, conditions attached to certification have been related to the effects of these fisheries on seabirds and marine mammals. Here essential parts of a management regime, such as biological reference points and harvest control rules, have come about as a direct result of MSC certification. MSC certification is no panacea, but it seems to have found a niche as a supplement to national legislation and international agreements.

References Powered by Scopus

Is Marine Stewardship Council's ecolabel a rising tide for all? Consumers’ willingness to pay for origin-differentiated ecolabeled canned tuna

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Contested accountability logics in evolving nonstate certification for fisheries sustainability

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What do we know about the impacts of the Marine Stewardship Council seafood ecolabelling program? A systematic map

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Developing sustainable, cost-effective and high-performance shrimp feed formulations containing low fish meal levels

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Next steps in Arctic Ocean Governance Meeting the challenge of coordinating a dynamic regime complex

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Enrollment, retention, and inclusivity of Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) eco-labelling certifications

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hønneland, G. (2020). Marine stewardship council (Msc) certification of arctic fisheries: Processes and outcomes. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 11, 133–156. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2488

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

43%

Environmental Science 3

43%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0