Clinical and radiological outcomes of modified mini-open and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A comparative study

6Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of modified mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (modMOTLIF) and open TLIF (OTLIF). Overview of Literature: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MTLIF) is associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and less pain. However, it has concerns like increased radiation exposure, steep learning curve, and instrumentation cost. We modified the MTLIF technique by direct freehand insertion of pedicle screws using stab incisions without tubular retractors. Methods: The study included 24 patients in the modMOTLIF group and 27 patients in the OTLIF group. The average follow-up period was 25.6 months. Clinical outcomes were measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Serial X-rays were acquired at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months to assess the union and presence of instability. We also compared blood loss and length of hospital stay in both groups. Results: All patients showed progressive improvement in VAS and ODI scores. No differences were observed in the preoperative and postoperative ODI and VAS leg scores between the groups. The immediate postoperative VAS back score was significantly higher in the OTLIF group than in the modMOTLIF group; however, no difference was observed at 1 and 2 years. Radiological analysis showed nonunion in one and two patients in the OTLIF and modMOTLIF groups, respectively. The average blood loss was 63 mL in the mod- MOTLIF group and 254 mL in the OTLIF group. The mean hospital stay was 3 days for the modMOTLIF group and 5 days for the OTLIF group. Conclusions: modMOTLIF was associated with reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stay compared with OTLIF. No significant differences were observed in the clinical and radiological outcomes between the groups after 2 years despite reduced back pain in the immediate postoperative period in patients who underwent modMOTLIF.

References Powered by Scopus

Minimally invasive lumbar fusion

531Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): Technical feasibility and initial results

517Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A one-stage procedure in operative treatment of spondylolisthesis: Dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion

425Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion — A narrative review on the present status

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the surgical management of post-discectomy syndrome

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Distinct fusion intersegmental parameters regarding local sagittal balance provide similar clinical outcomes: A comparative study of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ganesan, S., Jayabalan, V., Kumar, V., & Kailash, K. (2018). Clinical and radiological outcomes of modified mini-open and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A comparative study. Asian Spine Journal, 12(23), 544–550. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.544

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

50%

Researcher 3

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 13

76%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

12%

Engineering 1

6%

Psychology 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free