Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two different landiolol formulations in a healthy Caucasian group

14Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background To date, no data have been reported on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of landiolol, a fast-acting cardioselective β1-adrenergic antagonist, in non-Asian subjects. The aim of this study was to compare two landiolol formulations in healthy Caucasian subjects. Materials and methods We conducted a single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized study in two cross-over periods with 12 healthy subjects (7 women and 5 men) each receiving three doses (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mg/kg BW) of Onoact® 50 Lyophilized powder (50 mg) or Rapibloc® concentrate IV (20 mg/2 mL) to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and tolerability of the two landiolol formulations. Results For both formulations, maximum blood concentrations of landiolol were rapidly reached (median tmax 2.3 ± 0.65 and 2.8 ± 1.13 min for the high dose of each formulation). The compounds had a short half-life (t1/2 = 3.2 ± 1.2 min and 3.0 ± 1.1 min for the low dose of the concentrate formulation and the lyophilized powder, respectively). The results showed no statistically significant differences between both formulations of landiolol for any PK parameters, at study doses. Both formulations dose-dependently and significantly decreased the heart rate values from 62.2 bpm at baseline to minimum values of 55–56, 52–53, and 50–52 bpm after 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mg/kg respectively. This bradycardic effect was achieved within 1 to 3 min. The decrease in systolic blood pressure (baseline: 107 mm Hg, minimum values were around 99 mm Hg) was significant but not dose dependent, and occurred within 3 to 12 min. Seven mild to moderate AEs occurred after administration of the concentrate formulation. No SAEs were reported in this study. Conclusion In Caucasians, both landiolol formulations showed similar pharmacokinetic behaviours, displaying very short half-lives (3.0 to 3.6 min). In addition, after administration of both formulations, the landiolol-induced heart rate reduction showed fast onset and dose dependence, whilst the decrease of systolic blood pressure occurred more slowly, was less pronounced, and dose independent. In summary, both landiolol formulations delivered comparable plasma concentration profiles and showed good local tolerability. Overall, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic reactions observed in Caucasians were comparable to those described in Japanese subjects.

References Powered by Scopus

Interventions on prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery: A meta-analysis

418Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of ethnicity in variability in response to drugs: Focus on clinical pharmacology studies

351Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of prophylactic drug therapy in preventing supraventricular arrhythmia early after coronary artery bypass grafting

208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Landiolol: A Review in Tachyarrhythmias

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bolus application of landiolol and esmolol: comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in a healthy Caucasian group

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Landiolol in patients with septic shock resident in an intensive care unit (LANDI-SEP): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krumpl, G., Ulc, I., Trebs, M., Kadlecová, P., & Hodisch, J. (2016). Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two different landiolol formulations in a healthy Caucasian group. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 92, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2016.06.022

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Researcher 4

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

45%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

18%

Computer Science 2

18%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0