Run-time fuzzy optimization of IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs performance

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper we focus on run-time optimization of the IEEE 802.11 protocol to improve its performance using a well-known fuzzy logic approach. Specifically, we derive the simple, and more accurate, approximation of the network contention level and the average size of contention window to maximize the theoretical throughput limit. In addition, we propose and evaluate a new distributed fuzzy contention control mechanism that is a modification of the asymptotically optimal backoff (AOB) mechanism using a fuzzy logic approach. The proposed mechanism can be used to extend the standard 802.11 access mechanism without requiring any additional hardware like the AOB mechanism. To verify efficiency of our mechanism, the performance of the IEEE 802.11 standard protocol with the AOB and the proposed mechanism are investigated through simulations. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

References Powered by Scopus

Dynamic tuning of the IEEE 802.11 protocol to achieve a theoretical throughput limit

1156Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

IEEE 802.11 wireless local area networks

910Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

IEEE 802.11 protocol: design and performance evaluation of an adaptive backoff mechanism

469Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Channel Status based Sliding Contention Window (CS-SCW) algorithm: A Fuzzy Control Approach for Medium Access in Wireless Networks

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of the distributed fuzzy contention control for IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, Y. J., & Lim, M. T. (2005). Run-time fuzzy optimization of IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs performance. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3612, pp. 1079–1088). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11539902_137

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

50%

Philosophy 1

25%

Engineering 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free