Battery drain in daily practice and medium-term projections on longevity of cardioverterdefibrillators: An analysis from a remote monitoring database

22Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims The longevity of generators is a crucial determinant of the cost-effectiveness of therapy with implantable cardioverterdefibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D). We evaluated the trend of devicemeasured residual battery capacity and longevity projections over 5-year follow-up.We also investigated possible factors associated with battery drain. Methods and results Data from 4851 patients in the European LATITUDEw database who were followed up for a minimum of 3 years were analysed. The factors associated with battery drain (i.e. year-to-year decrease in residual battery capacity), and thus potentially impacting on device longevity, were mainly the pacing parameters in CRT-D devices and the number of shocks delivered and diverted in both ICD and CRT-D (all P < 0.01 on linear regression analysis). Over the first 5 years, the longevity estimates provided by devices showed low intra-patient variability and increased with time. The estimates exceeded 10 years for CRT-Dand 13 and 12 years for single- and dual-chamber ICDs, respectively. In CRT-D patients, the expected patient age on replacement was 80±12 years, and the expected probability of undergoing device replacement was 63±13% for New York Heart Association (NYHA) II patients and 37±16% for NYHA III patients. For comparison, the probabilities of replacing a CRT-D lasting 5 years were 78±8 and 59±13%, respectively (both P, 0.001). Conclusion Battery drain was mainly associated with pacing output in CRT-D devices and with the number of capacitor charges in both ICD and CRT-D devices. The longevity estimates provided by the devices were consistent and conservative. According to these estimates, among CRT-D recipients a low proportion of patients should require device replacement.

References Powered by Scopus

Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming

1158Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy

955Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Complication rates associated with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacements and upgrade procedures: Results from the REPLACE registry

664Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

“Real life” longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Battery longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: Technical, clinical and economic aspects. An expert review paper from EHRA

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Technologies for Prolonging Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Longevity

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boriani, G., Ritter, P., Biffi, M., Ziacchi, M., Diemberger, I., Martignani, C., … Gadler, F. (2016). Battery drain in daily practice and medium-term projections on longevity of cardioverterdefibrillators: An analysis from a remote monitoring database. Europace, 18(9), 1366–1373. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv436

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

47%

Researcher 14

47%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

68%

Engineering 5

20%

Computer Science 2

8%

Chemical Engineering 1

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free