Improving Graduate Medical Education by Aggregating Data Across the Medical Education Continuum

3Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Meaningful improvements to graduate medical education (GME) have been achieved in recent decades, yet many GME improvement pilots have been small trials without rigorous outcome measures and with limited generalizability. Thus, lack of access to large-scale data is a key barrier to generating empiric evidence to improve GME. In this article, the authors examine the potential of a national GME data infrastructure to improve GME, review the output of 2 national workshops on this topic, and propose a path toward achieving this goal. The authors envision a future where medical education is shaped by evidence from rigorous research powered by comprehensive, multi-institutional data. To achieve this goal, premedical education, undergraduate medical education, GME, and practicing physician data must be collected using a common data dictionary and standards and longitudinally linked using unique individual identifiers. The envisioned data infrastructure could provide a foundation for evidence-based decisions across all aspects of GME and help optimize the education of individual residents. Two workshops hosted by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Board on Health Care Services explored the prospect of better using GME data to improve education and its outcomes. There was broad consensus about the potential value of a longitudinal data infrastructure to improve GME. Significant obstacles were also noted. Suggested next steps outlined by the authors include producing a more complete inventory of data already being collected and managed by key medical education leadership organizations, pursuing a grass-roots data sharing pilot among GME-sponsoring institutions, and formulating the technical and governance frameworks needed to aggregate data across organizations. The power and potential of big data is evident across many disciplines, and the authors believe that harnessing the power of big data in GME is the best next step toward advancing evidence-based physician education.

References Powered by Scopus

Burnout among u.s. medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general u.s. population

1383Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Graduate medical education that meets the nation's health needs

279Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A call to action: The controversy of and rationale for competency-based medical education

185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thelen, A. E., George, B. C., Burkhardt, J. C., Khamees, D., Haas, M. R. C., & Weinstein, D. (2024). Improving Graduate Medical Education by Aggregating Data Across the Medical Education Continuum. Academic Medicine, 99(2), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005313

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘250255075100

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

56%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

22%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

70%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

10%

Neuroscience 1

10%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0