Implementing patient-reported outcome surveys as part of routine care: Lessons from an academic radiation oncology department

46Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are reports of health conditions that come directly from patients. Use of PROs has been associated with improved patient outcomes, enhanced quality of life, and reduced end-of-life spending. Yet there are still outstanding questions regarding the process of implementing PRO collection in routine practice. In this article, we describe the experience of selecting and implementing PROs in a multisite, multidisease academic medical center-based radiation oncology practice and demonstrate that such largescale rollout is feasible. We establish that PROs can be implemented with minimal to no workflow delays, are generally seen as valuable by clinicians, and can enhance patient-doctor communication. We additionally detail the challenges involved in selecting clinically relevant PRO questionnaires and the centrality of physician buyin, easy data access, and clear workflows to successful implementation.

References Powered by Scopus

Development of the national cancer institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)

777Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: Relationships with clinical outcomes

514Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: A scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors

394Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Innovations in research and clinical care using patient-generated health data

95Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Provider perspectives on the integration of patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record

76Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rotenstein, L. S., Agarwal, A., O’Neil, K., Kelly, A., Keaty, M., Whitehouse, C., … Martin, N. E. (2017). Implementing patient-reported outcome surveys as part of routine care: Lessons from an academic radiation oncology department. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(5), 964–968. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx009

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

67%

Researcher 9

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

53%

Nursing and Health Professions 11

29%

Social Sciences 5

13%

Computer Science 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free