Adherence to EAT-Lancet dietary recommendations for health and sustainability in the Gambia

16Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Facilitating dietary change is pivotal to improving population health, increasing food system resilience, and minimizing adverse impacts on the environment, but assessment of the current ‘status-quo’ and identification of bottlenecks for improvement has been lacking to date. We assessed deviation of the Gambian diet from the EAT-Lancet guidelines for healthy and sustainable diets and identified leverage points to improve nutritional and planetary health. We analysed the 2015/16 Gambian Integrated Household Survey dataset comprising food consumption data from 12 713 households. Consumption of different food groups was compared against the EAT-Lancet reference diet targets to assess deviation from the guidelines. We computed a ‘sustainable and healthy diet index (SHDI)’ based on deviation of different food groups from the EAT-Lancet recommendations and modelled the socio-economic and geographic determinants of households that achieved higher scores on this index, using multivariable mixed effects regression. The average Gambian diet had very low adherence to EAT-Lancet recommendations. The diet was dominated by refined grains and added sugars which exceeded the recommendations. SHDI scores for nutritionally important food groups such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, dairy, poultry, and beef and lamb were low. Household characteristics associated with higher SHDI scores included: being a female-headed household, having a relatively small household size, having a schooled head of the household, having a high wealth index, and residing in an urban settlement. Furthermore, diets reported in the dry season and households with high crop production diversity showed increased adherence to the targets. While average Gambian diets include lower amounts of food groups with harmful environmental footprint, they are also inadequate in healthy food groups and are high in sugar. There are opportunities to improve diets without increasing their environmental footprint by focusing on the substitution of refined grains by wholegrains, reducing sugar and increasing fruit and vegetables consumption.

References Powered by Scopus

Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems

6726Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

3812Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dietary pattern analysis: A new direction in nutritional epidemiology

3282Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Avengers, assemble the literature! A multi-study review of consumption, environmental values, and planetary health research

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet is associated with higher nutrient adequacy in the NutriNet-Santé cohort: a cross-sectional study

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Planetary health diet and cardiovascular disease: results from three large prospective cohort studies in the USA

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ali, Z., Scheelbeek, P. F. D., Felix, J., Jallow, B., Palazzo, A., Segnon, A. C., … Green, R. (2022). Adherence to EAT-Lancet dietary recommendations for health and sustainability in the Gambia. Environmental Research Letters, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac9326

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

78%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

13%

Researcher 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13

59%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

23%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

14%

Engineering 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0