Exploring Entrepreneurship Education Effectiveness at British Universities – An Application of the World Café Method

11Citations
Citations of this article
119Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Universities have made significant investments in entrepreneurship programs for decades, but the scope, relevance and usefulness of entrepreneurship education are still questioned. This study aims to explore the meaning of effectiveness as it relates to entrepreneurship education in a grounded and holistic sense, recognizing both the range of stakeholders involved in the design, delivery and experience of entrepreneurship education and the underlying complexity of the issue at hand. Two World Café events, a method designed to elicit grounded knowledge, were organized to seek insights from a diverse range of stakeholders. Results confirm and illustrate the complex nature of effectiveness in entrepreneurship education. The purpose of specific educational initiatives, diverse audiences’ expectations and contextual factors must be considered in any meaningful attempt at identifying effectiveness. Findings also revealed a consensus that effectiveness relates to creating a transformational process, which leads to a shift in attitudes towards entrepreneurship. This shift prepares students for careers that go beyond the launch of a new venture. The role of time lags in assessing effectiveness was also identified. We suggest an agenda for future research and practical implications.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Decker-Lange, C., Lange, K., Dhaliwal, S., & Walmsley, A. (2022). Exploring Entrepreneurship Education Effectiveness at British Universities – An Application of the World Café Method. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 5(1), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127420935391

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 22

40%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

38%

Researcher 8

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 33

66%

Social Sciences 7

14%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6

12%

Computer Science 4

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free