Defining and delivering resilient ecological networks: Nature conservation in England

64Citations
Citations of this article
226Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Planning for nature conservation has increasingly emphasised the concepts of resilience and spatial networks. Although the importance of habitat networks for individual species is clear, their significance for long-term ecological resilience and multi-species conservation strategies is less established. Referencing spatial network theory, we describe the conceptual basis for defining and assessing a network of wildlife areas that supports species’ resilience to multiple forms of perturbations and pressures. We explore actions that could enhance network resilience at a range of scales, based on ecological principles, with reference to four well-established strategies for intervention in a spatial network (“Better, Bigger, More and Joined”) from the influential Making Space for Nature report by Lawton et al. (). Building existing theory into useable and scalable approaches applicable to large numbers of species is challenging but tractable. We illustrate the policy context, describe the elements of a long-term adaptive management plan and provide example actions, metrics and targets for early implementation using England as a case study, where there is an opportunity to include large-scale ecological planning in a newly launched 25-year environment plan. Policy implications. The concept of resilient ecological networks has attracted scientific and political support, but there is no consensus on what a resilient network would look like, or how to assess it. Therefore, it is unclear whether existing targets for action will be sufficient to achieve network resilience. We show that the scientific principles to place resilience and network theory at the heart of large-scale and long-term environmental planning are established and ready to implement in practice. Delivering a resilient network to support nature recovery is achievable and can be integrated with ongoing conservation actions and targets, by assessing their effectiveness on properties of the entire network. England's 25 Year Environment Plan promises to deliver a natural environment that is protected and enhanced for the future and so provides the ideal testbed.

References Powered by Scopus

Biodiversity and Resilience of Ecosystem Functions

1018Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape

834Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Empirical approaches to metacommunities: A review and comparison with theory

564Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Combatting global grassland degradation

838Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Climate resilience in marine protected areas and the ‘Protection Paradox’

155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The complex ecological network's resilience of the Wuhan metropolitan area

122Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Isaac, N. J. B., Brotherton, P. N. M., Bullock, J. M., Gregory, R. D., Boehning-Gaese, K., Connor, B., … Mace, G. M. (2018). Defining and delivering resilient ecological networks: Nature conservation in England. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55(6), 2537–2543. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13196

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 78

55%

Researcher 45

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 63

48%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57

43%

Social Sciences 6

5%

Engineering 6

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 7
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0