Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond?

281Citations
Citations of this article
409Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

References Powered by Scopus

Retracted: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children

2052Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Retraction of an interpretation

239Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tobacco industry influence on science and scientists in Germany

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Vaccine hesitancy: An overview

1543Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era

976Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States

903Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diethelm, P., & McKee, M. (2009, January). Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond? European Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckn139

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 153

63%

Researcher 54

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 21

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 13

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 55

34%

Medicine and Dentistry 46

28%

Psychology 34

21%

Environmental Science 28

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 14
News Mentions: 22
References: 26
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2043

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0