Noncrossing trees and noncrossing graphs

7Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We give a parity reversing involution on noncrossing trees that leads to a combinatorial interpretation of a formula on noncrossing trees and symmetric ternary trees in answer to a problem proposed by Hough. We use the representation of Panholzer and Prodinger for noncrossing trees and find a correspondence between a class of noncrossing trees, called proper noncrossing trees, and the set of symmetric ternary trees. The second result of this paper is a parity reversing involution on connected noncrossing graphs which leads to a relation between the number of noncrossing trees with n edges and k descents and the number of connected noncrossing graphs with n+1 vertices and m edges.

References Powered by Scopus

Analytic combinatorics of non-crossing configurations

129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Enumeration of noncrossing trees on a circle

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Statistics on non-crossing trees

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2-Binary trees: Bijections and related issues

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dyck paths with coloured ascents

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Matchings avoiding partial patterns

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, W. Y. C., & Yan, S. H. F. (2006). Noncrossing trees and noncrossing graphs. Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 13(1 N), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37236/1150

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

57%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 6

86%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free