The role of off-frequency masking in binaural hearing

  • Buss E
  • Hall J
7Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The present studies examined the binaural masking level difference (MLD) for off-frequency masking. It has been shown previously that the MLD decreases steeply with increasing spectral separation between a pure tone signal and a 10-Hz wide band of masking noise. Data collected here show that this reduction in the off-frequency MLD as a function of signal/masker separation is comparable at 250 and 2500 Hz, indicating that neither interaural phase cues nor frequency resolution are critical to this finding. The MLD decreases more gradually with spectral separation when the masker is a 250-Hz-wide band of noise, a result that implicates the rate of inherent amplitude modulation of the masker. Thresholds were also measured for a brief signal presented coincident with a local masker modulation minimum or maximum. Sensitivity was better in the minima for all NoSπ and off-frequency NoSo conditions, with little or no effect of signal position for on-frequency NoSo conditions. Taken together, the present results indicate that the steep reduction in the off-frequency MLD for a narrowband noise masker is due at least in part to envelope cues in the NoSo conditions. There was no evidence of a reduction in binaural cue quality for off-frequency masking.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
304Citations
45Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

17Citations
43Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

7Citations
17Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buss, E., & Hall, J. W. (2010). The role of off-frequency masking in binaural hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(6), 3666–3677. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3377053

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘17‘19‘2201234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

67%

Researcher 4

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

40%

Neuroscience 2

20%

Engineering 2

20%

Psychology 2

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0