Very large and huge effect sizes

1.8kCitations
Citations of this article
375Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recommendations to expand Cohen's (1988) rules of thumb for interpreting effect sizes are given to include very large and huge effect sizes. The reasons for the expansion, and implications for designing Monte Carlo studies, are discussed. © 2009 JMASM, Inc.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement

6018Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review

1218Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs for Youth: A Meta-Analytic Review

923Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Machine Learning Approaches for Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry

642Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dopamine and glutamate in schizophrenia: biology, symptoms and treatment

383Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings

369Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). Very large and huge effect sizes. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 133

65%

Researcher 32

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 21

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 20

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 24

27%

Social Sciences 22

25%

Engineering 22

25%

Sports and Recreations 21

24%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 5
References: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 31

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free