Insect identification among deep learning’s meta-architectures using tensorflow

11Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Agriculture provides food for human existence, where insects damage the crops. The identification of the insect is a difficult process and subjected to expert opinion. In recent years, researches using deep learning in fields of object detection have been widespread and show accuracy as a result. This study show the comparison of three widely used deep learning meta-architectures (Faster R-CNN, SSD Inception and SSD Mobilenet) as object detection for selected flying insects namely Phyllophaga spp., Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura. The proposed study is focused on accuracy performance of selected meta-architectures using small dataset of insects. The meta-architecture was tested with same environment for all three architectures and Faster RCNN meta-architecture performs outstanding with an accuracy of 95.33%.

References Powered by Scopus

SSD: Single shot multibox detector

25311Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision

24474Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fast R-CNN

23542Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

From identification to forecasting: the potential of image recognition and artificial intelligence for aphid pest monitoring

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research on Identification Technology of Field Pests with Protective Color Characteristics

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Unravelling the use of artificial intelligence in management of insect pests

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel, D. J., & Bhatt, N. (2019). Insect identification among deep learning’s meta-architectures using tensorflow. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(1), 1910–1914. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.A1031.109119

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

47%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

24%

Researcher 3

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 12

57%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

29%

Engineering 2

10%

Decision Sciences 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free