Attitudes Toward Genetics and Genetic Testing Among Participants in the Jackson and Framingham Heart Studies

10Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Genetic analysis has become integral to many large cohort studies. However, little is known about longitudinal cohort study participants’ attitudes toward genetics and genetic testing. We analyzed data from a survey of participants in the Jackson Heart Study (n = 960), Framingham Heart Study (n = 955), and Framingham Heart Study–Omni Cohort (n = 160). Based on a three-question attitude scale, most participants had positive attitudes toward genetic testing (median score = 4.3-5/5). Participants were also asked to select words to describe their attitudes toward genetics. More respondents endorsed the positive words “hopeful” (60%-70%), “optimistic” (44%-64%), “enthusiastic” (35%-43%), or “excited” (28%-30%) than the negative words “cautious” (35%-38%), “concerned” (25%-55%), “worried” (6%-13%), “pessimistic” (2%-5%), or “horrified” (1%-5%). Characteristics associated with favorable attitudes were greater genetics knowledge, higher subjective numeracy, experience with genetic testing, less frequent religious attendance, and not being employed. These findings demonstrate variation in attitudes even among participants in long-standing cohort studies, indicating a need for ongoing participant engagement and education.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the subjective numeracy scale

736Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

AIC and BIC: Comparisons of assumptions and performance

669Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cohort Profile: The Framingham Heart Study (FHS): Overview of milestones in cardiovascular epidemiology

274Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes concerning genetic testing among young jordanians

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Public attitudes toward genetic risk scoring in medicine and beyond

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perspectives and preferences regarding genomic secondary findings in underrepresented prenatal and pediatric populations: A mixed-methods approach

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saylor, K. W., Ekunwe, L., Antoine-LaVigne, D., Sellers, D. E., McGraw, S., Levy, D., … Joffe, S. (2019). Attitudes Toward Genetics and Genetic Testing Among Participants in the Jackson and Framingham Heart Studies. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(3), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619844851

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

61%

Researcher 5

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

29%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

24%

Psychology 3

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free