The Most Appropriate Reuse of Historic Buildings

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A widespread tendency is the adaptive reuse of historic buildings, which has an impact negatively or positively on their heritage significance. The aim of the current paper which depends on an analytical descriptive approach is to analyze several global experiences that have adopted "Most Appropriate Reuse" of historic buildings to provide a theoretical basis for a comprehensive methodology for this policy through analyses and comparisons to derive the most important methodologies for reuse in general and “Most Appropriate Reuse” in particular, using criteria and indicators from studies to build the theoretical framework of the proposed methodology, which could serve as a basis for future practical studies. Contributors to the project will benefit from this paper by learning about reuse mechanisms and gaining more knowledge about the best reuse mechanism and how to access and implement it in accordance with predetermined criteria and indications.

References Powered by Scopus

Sustainable Building Adaptation: Innovations in Decision-making

116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors influencing the adaptive re-use of buildings

109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adaptive reuse of the built heritage: Concepts and cases of an emerging discipline

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

National Artistic Traditions in the Formation of a Model of Architectural Development of City Limits

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Difficulties in rebuilding historic bridges after conflicts: the case of the Mosul stone bridge

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jasim, S. A., & Ismaeel, E. H. (2023). The Most Appropriate Reuse of Historic Buildings. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(6), 1865–1875. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180622

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 2

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free