Different biological action of oleic acid in ALDHhigh and ALDHlow subpopulations separated from ductal carcinoma in situ of breast cancer

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The mechanisms underlying breast cancer progression of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) associated with fatty acids are largely unknown. In the present study, we compared the action of oleic acid (OA) on two human DCIS cell lines, MCF10DCIS.COM (ER/PR/HER2- negative) and SUM225 (HER2 overexpressed). OA led to a significant increase in proliferation, migration, lipid accumulation and the expression of lipogenic proteins, such as SREBP-1, FAS and ACC-1, in MCF10DCIS.COM cells but not SUM225 cells. The ALDHhigh subpopulation analyzed by the ALDEFLUOR assay was approximately 39.2±5.3% of MCF10DCIS.COM cells but was small (3.11±0.9%) in SUM225 cells. We further investigated the different biological action of OA in the distinct ALDHlow and ALDHhigh subpopulations of MCF10DCIS.COM cells. OA led to an increase in the expression of ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2 and ALDH1A3 in MCF10DCIS.COM cells. SREBP-1 and ACC-1 were highly expressed in ALDHhigh cells relative to ALDHlow cells, whereas FAS was higher in ALDHlow cells. In the presence of OA, ALDHhigh cells were more likely to proliferate and migrate and displayed significantly high levels of SREBP-1 and FAS and strong phosphorylation of FAK and AKT relative to ALDHlow cells. This study suggests that OA could be a critical risk factor to promote the proliferation and migration of ALDHhigh cells in DCIS, leading to breast cancer progression.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Oleic acid (OA) promotes the proliferation andmigration ability of MCF10DCIS.COM cells but not SUM225 cells, whereas palmitic acid (PA) leads to cell death in both cells. (A and B) MTT assay of cell proliferation in MCF10DCIS.COM and SUM225 cells incubated with increasing OA or PA. OA induced significantly increased viability in MCF10DCIS.COM cells but led to cell death in SUM225 cells. PA induced the death of both MCF10DCIS.COM and SUM225 cells. (C) Trans-well assay of cell migration in MCF10DCIS.COM and SUM 225 cells. OA significantly promoted the migration of MCF10DCIS.COM cell but not SUM225 cells. (D) Wound healing assay of lateral migration of MCF10DCIS.COM cells incubated with OA. OA significantly enhanced the lateral migration of MCF10DCIS.COM cells. All the experiments were performed at least in triplicate and the values are reported as the means ± standard error. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
  • Fig 2. Oleic acid (OA) induces lipid accumulation and the upregulation of lipogenic proteins in MCF10DCIS.COM cells but not SUM225 cells. (A) Representative Oil Red O staining in MCF10DCIS.COM and SUM 225 cells incubated with OA. A large number of lipid droplets were observed in MCF10DCIS.COM cells but not SUM225 cells. (B) Quantitative analysis of intracellular lipid contents from Oil Red O staining. OA led to lipid accumulation in MCF10DCIS.COM cells. (C) Representative Western blot of SREBP-1, FAS and ACC-1 in MCF10DCIS.COM and SUM 225 cells incubated with OA. (D) Quantitative analysis of lipogenic protein levels in MCF10DCIS.COM and SUM225 cells. A significantly higher level of SERBP-1 was observed in MCF10DCIS.COM cells relative to SUM225 cells. The FAS level was significantly higher in SUM225 cells than MCF10DCIS.COM cells. The level of ACC-1 was similar between MCF10DCIS.COM cells and SUM225 cells (upper). OA resulted in the significant upregulation of SREBP-1, FAS and ACC-1 in MCF10DCIS.COM cells (middle) but led to the downregulation of SREBP-1 and the upregulation of ACC-1 significantly in SUM225 cells (lower). All experiments were performed at least in triplicate, and the values are reported as the means ± standard error. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
  • Fig 3. Oleic acid (OA) promotes the viability andmigration through the FAK, PI3K/AKT, and MEK/ERK signaling pathway in MCF10DCIS.COM cells. (A and B) Representative Western blot and quantitative analysis of phosphorylated FAK, AKT and ERK1/2 in MCF10DCIS.COM cells incubated with OA. OA induced a significant increase in the phosphorylation of FAK, AKT and ERK1/2. (C) MTT assay of cell proliferation in MCF10DCIS.COM cells incubated with OA in the presence of FAK (PF573228), PI3K/AKT (LY294002) and MEK/ERK (PD98059) inhibitors. All kinase inhibitors induced cell death, and OA-promoted proliferation was reduced in the presence of all kinase inhibitors. (D) Trans-well assay of cell migration in MCF10DCIS.COM cells incubated with OA in the presence of FAK, PI3K/AKT andMEK/ERK inhibitors. OA-induced migration was suppressed by the presence of all kinase inhibitors. All the experiments were performed at least in triplicate, and the values are reported as the means ± standard error. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
  • Fig 4. Distinct subpopulations of ALDH1high and ALDH1low cells were separated fromMCF10DCIS. COM cells. (A) Representative flow cytometry for ALDEFLUOR assay showing the percentage of ALDHhigh cells in MCD10DCIS.COM and SUM225 cells. Graph showed that the ALDHhigh cell population obtained from experiments performed at least in triplicate. Cells exhibiting high ALDH activity were higher in MCF10DCIS. COM cells relative to SUM225 cells. (B) Quantitative real-time RT-PCR of ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2 and ALDH1A3 in ALDH1high and ALDH1low subpopulation cells separated fromMCF10DCIS.COM cells. Significantly higher expression levels of ALDH1A2 and ALDH1A3mRNAs were detected in ALDHhigh cells relative to ALDHlow cells. The experiments were performed at least in triplicate, and the values are reported as the means ± standard error. *p<0.05, **p<0.01. (C) RT-PCR analysis of CD24 and CD44mRNAs in ALDHhigh and ALDHlow cells. CD44 mRNAwas higher in ALDH1high cells than ALDH1low cells. (D) Flow cytometric analysis of CD44 and CD24. Of MCF10DCIS.COM cells, 70% exhibited the CD44+/CD24phenotype. CD44+/CD24- cell populations were higher in separated ALDH1high cells than ALDH1low cells. (E) Immunofluorescence staining of CD44, CD24 and ALDH1. ALDH1high cells expressed a high level of ALDH1 and CD44, whereas ALDH1low cells displayed a high level of CD24 and a low level of ALDH1 and CD44.
  • Fig 5. Oleic acid (OA) further promotes the proliferation andmigration abilities and upregulates lipogenic proteins in ALDHhigh cells. (A) Quantitative real-time RT-PCR of ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2 and ALDH1A3 in MCF10DCIS.COM cells. All subtypes of ALDH1 were significantly increased by OA. Notably, OA led to a remarkable increase in ALDH1A2 in MCF10DCIS.COM cells. (B) MTT assay of cell proliferation in ALDHhigh and ALDHlow cells incubated with OA. OA-induced proliferation of ALDHhigh cells was greater than that of ALDHlow cells. (C) Trans-well assay of cell migration in ALDHhigh and ALDHlow cells. The OAinduced migration ability was higher in ALDHhigh cells than ALDHlow cells. (D) Representative Western blot of SREBP-1, FAS and ACC-1 in ALDHhigh cells and ALDHlow cells. (E, F and G) Analysis of expression levels of SREBP-1, FAS and ACC-1. Significantly higher expression of SERBP-1 and ACC-1 was observed in ALDHhigh cells, whereas FAS was significantly higher in ALDHlow cells. OA led to the significant upregulation of SREBP-1 and FAS in ALDHhigh cells and the significant upregulation of SREBP-1 and downregulation of FAS in ALDHlow cells. All experiments were performed at least in triplicate, and the values are reported as the means ± standard error. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
  • Fig 6. Oleic acid (OA) leads to the strong phosphorylation of FAK and AKT in ALDHhigh cells, resulting in high proliferation andmigration. (A) Representative Western blot of the phosphorylation of FAK, AKT and ERK1/2 in ALDHhigh cells and ALDHlow cells treated with OA. (B) Analysis of the phosphorylated levels of FAK, AKT and ERK1/2 in ALDHhigh and ALDHlow cells. The phosphorylation level of FAK and AKT was higher in ALDHhigh cells compared to ALDHlow cells. (C) MTT assay of cell viability in the presence of FAK (PF573228), PI3K/AKT (LY294002) and MEK/ERK (PD98059) inhibitors. All inhibitors decreased the cell viability and suppressed the proliferative ability promoted by OA in ALDHhigh and ALDHlow cells. (D) Transwell assay of cell migration in ALDHhigh cells and ALDHlow cells pretreated with FAK (PF573228), PI3K/AKT (LY294002) and MEK/ERK (PD98059) inhibitors. The OA-promoted migration was suppressed by the presence of all kinase inhibitors. All the experiments were performed at least in triplicate, and the values represent the means ± standard error. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.

References Powered by Scopus

ALDH1 Is a Marker of Normal and Malignant Human Mammary Stem Cells and a Predictor of Poor Clinical Outcome

3406Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Overweight, obesity and cancer: Epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms

2961Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fatty acid synthase and the lipogenic phenotype in cancer pathogenesis

2376Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Linoleic and oleic acids enhance cell migration by altering the dynamics of microtubules and the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton at the leading edge

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Spatial Relationship of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions with Respect to the Fat-Gland Interface on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Molecular Mechanisms of Dietary Compounds in Cancer Stem Cells from Solid Tumors: Insights into Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancer

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H. S., Jung, M., Choi, S. K., Moon, W. K., & Kim, S. J. (2016). Different biological action of oleic acid in ALDHhigh and ALDHlow subpopulations separated from ductal carcinoma in situ of breast cancer. PLoS ONE, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160835

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

75%

Researcher 3

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

33%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

22%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 7

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0