Differences in types of artificial cranial deformation are related to differences in frequencies of cranial and oral health markers in pre-columbian skulls from Peru

11Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Artificial cranial deformation is a cultural practice that modifies the shape of the skull during the early infancy. It is not related to rites of passage, but to different social status in a group. Therefore, the deformed cranium is an expression of individual affirmation and affiliation to a given social group. Osteological material from Pasamayo (AD 1200-1450), a cemetery in central coast of Peru, was analyzed to test whether individuals presenting different types of cranial deformation (interpreted as a sign of different social status) present differences in health status. Three types of cranial deformation were observed and five osteological markers (cribra orbitalia, cranial trauma, antemortem tooth loss, dental caries, and periodontal cavities) related to health status were analyzed in 78 crania. No significant differences were found in terms of these osteological markers among females in relation to the different types of cranial deformation. However, males presenting occipital deformation had significantly less caries and periodontal cavities than the others. Moreover, males presenting fronto-lambdoid deformation had more antemortem tooth loss than the other males. Therefore, although different types of cranial deformation can be potentially associated to distinct social status, differences in health status could only be observed in the male sample.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Okumura, M. (2014). Differences in types of artificial cranial deformation are related to differences in frequencies of cranial and oral health markers in pre-columbian skulls from Peru. Boletim Do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi:Ciencias Humanas, 9(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1981-81222014000100002

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Researcher 4

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 10

50%

Arts and Humanities 4

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

15%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free