Discriminative analysis of Parkinson's disease based on whole-brain functional connectivity

45Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recently, there has been an increasing emphasis on applications of pattern recognition and neuroimaging techniques in the effective and accurate diagnosis of psychiatric or neurological disorders. In the present study, we investigated the whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity patterns of Parkinson's disease (PD), which are expected to provide additional information for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of this disease. First, we computed the functional connectivity between each pair of 116 regions of interest derived from a prior atlas. The most discriminative features based on Kendall tau correlation coefficient were then selected. A support vector machine classifier was employed to classify 21 PD patients with 26 demographically matched healthy controls. This method achieved a classification accuracy of 93.62% using leave-one-out cross-validation, with a sensitivity of 90.47% and a specificity of 96.15%. The majority of the most discriminative functional connections were located within or across the default mode, cingulo-opercular and frontal-parietal networks and the cerebellum. These disease-related resting-state network alterations might play important roles in the pathophysiology of this disease. Our results suggest that analyses of whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity patterns have the potential to improve the clinical diagnosis and treatment evaluation of PD.

Figures

  • Table 1. Demographic information for the patient and control samples.
  • Fig 1. The distribution of numbers of selected features identified using the parameter searchmethod in each fold.
  • Fig 2. The permutation distribution of the generation rates (1,000 repetitions) when selecting the 150most discriminating features: the x- and ylabels represent the generalization rate and occurrence number, respectively.GR0 is the generation rate obtained using the real class labels.
  • Fig 3. Region weights and the distribution of the 105 consensus functional connections. Regions are color-coded by category (CON, blue; DMN, green; cerebellum, red; visual network, brown; sensorimotor network, cyan; frontal-parietal network, rose; and others, black) and size-coded by weight. The line colors representing the change directions of the consensus functional connections in the patients are red for increases and blue for decreases.
  • Fig 4. Consensus functional connections demonstrated in the left and top view.Regions are color-coded by category and size-coded by weight as in Fig 3. Red lines represent increased functional connections, and blue lines represent decreased functional connections.
  • Table 2. Headmotion parameters.
  • Table 3. Existing studies regarding Parkinson’s disease classification.

References Powered by Scopus

Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri

7997Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Parkinson's disease: Clinical features and diagnosis

4176Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics

3120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Machine Learning for the Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease: A Review of Literature

238Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease

201Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Resting-state connectivity in neurodegenerative disorders: Is there potential for an imaging biomarker?

179Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, Y., Yang, W., Long, J., Zhang, Y., Feng, J., Li, Y., & Huang, B. (2015). Discriminative analysis of Parkinson’s disease based on whole-brain functional connectivity. PLoS ONE, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124153

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

60%

Researcher 16

30%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 16

36%

Medicine and Dentistry 12

27%

Engineering 8

18%

Psychology 8

18%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 10

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0